This is a very late comment on the whole Malou Fernandez's article in Manila Standard, "The Problem with Blogging". You know, the woman who got sort of infamous in the blogging universe for her tactless write-up about the OFWs?
So the last "latest thing" was her "no I'm not being bitter" attack on the bloggers.
This is how much not bitter she is:
Before I go any further I must stress the point that this is not about my previous issue, but simply the point of view of someone who has been a victim of vicious blogging and blogging as a new communication medium.
And again here:
...again, I repeat this is not a reaction toward my past actions.
And yet again:
I suppose I started some kind of trend by eliciting nasty comments and reactions via blog because of my indiscretion. But it seems to be a comfortable medium for people to vent their anger on just about everything they disagree with. I have been called an irresponsible journalist so what does that make you? It is easy to hide under the guise of anonymity you can say just about anything you want because you have no repercussions to deal with. It’s easy to hide behind a false moniker isn’t it?
And the last one I'm including in my list:
Just a thought to ponder on... Maybe I should start an anonymous blog and really let go...
Makes you think, right? This girl isn't really bitter with the reactions she got from her previous post. Not at all.
Right now, she got herself aimed at bloggers in general. I will not attempt to do a grammar Nazi check on her article, given my syntax is most probably as messed up. But I don't think she fully grasped the whole concept of blogging in general.
So let me continue, first of all I believe in the freedom of speech. By all means say what you need to say. Unfortunately for most of the bloggers without advertising you get paid nothing. If in fact you do get paid then hooray for you. But blogging, aside from Perez Hilton and the other big time bloggers (you know who you are) is for me a slacker job or a medium and pastime for lonely people to connect. Unless you’re in bloody Siberia or in a Gulag prison, try stepping outside your comfort zone and turn off the laptop or pc, you just might find some real live people to talk to instead of typing away in cyberspace.
First of all, to blog is essentially the whole point of blogging. I don't think bloggers became bloggers because they wanted to get paid to blog. This is not work. This is not a job you do because you need to pay the bills. You don't say, when I grow up, I want to be a blogger. You blog for a number of reasons, but I don't think money usually makes the top three for most people. Okay, so I don't have the statistics to back me up on this. This is mainly me throwing my assumption to the general public. Blog for money is icing on the cake. Sure, there are many "advertise on blogs" from numerous companies. And it's actually fun to earn some. You can post advertisements, or get paid for blogging like with using Smorty's. You pick your choice of thing to write about, you write about it, and hopefully your article gets approved and paid. But again, the thing is, you don't just blog for that. She actually got something right, it is a pastime. But in my personal opinion, its been a long time since the whole Internet has gotten off the whole stigma of being the venue where "lonely people" connect. Who said everything has to be done personally when things are more efficient done over the Internet? And don't you actually talk to real people when you're on the Internet? Sure, there are still a few kooks out there who make up their make believe world with their make persona's; but seriously, you don't meet those kinds in "real life"?
Then there was her comment about comparing bloggers with journalists:
The difference between a journalist and a blogger is that journalists have to adhere to certain guidelines that govern the freedom of speech. And whatever a journalist chooses to write about—be it popular or unpopular—we do not hide behind an anonymous name and are resigned to the fact that we have to take as much as we dish out. However, I simply detest people who place vicious comments and slanderous statements in blogs yet sign their messages as ‘anonymous.’ If you have something to say, don’t hide behind a false name. It’s just plain cowardice of you to do so. I have more of a deep sense of respect for those—however unpopular or vicious their statements are—who post their views with their real names and make no bones about it. At least they stand for something; I would rather take it from them than the cowards that hide behind false names.
In case you haven't noticed, the whole "freedom of speech" thing has been horribly, horribly misinterpreted and abused by journalists. Tell me you haven't read a tabloid doing an expose on the dirt of some famous person? They are still called journalist right? Blogging is all about giving out your opinions, and posting it for public viewing. But who says only those with degrees and gets published in decent newspapers can dish out their opinions. That is what writers in the "Life and Entertainment" section does right?
To end this very long post, I would just like to clarify that although I disagree with her in most points, I can't really say that she should stop writing because I find her opinion idiotic. I have very high tolerance for differing opinions. You're practicing your freedom of speech, and I'm practicing mine.
What do you think?